Introduction
Can you define fashion and style? Perhaps the most important question we should consider with this topic is whether there is in fact a difference between style and fashion. Can they be divided into two completely separate entities, with different meanings and purposes? Or are they too similar in context to separate? Of course if you took the physical definition of the two words you would find that they are in fact two totally different things, but in the context of clothes and being on trend is there still this same distinction?
The world of fashion is a fickle thing, to be a part of it you must be always mindful of your clothes and how you wear them. For those that take an interest in this world, we the writers and you the FashionBeans readers find that we must constantly judge ourselves and others. We do not do it in a malicious way, but still with a mind set on subjectivity; our personal opinion affects nearly everything. I am sure that nearly all of you will find yourself wandering around, quietly sizing up the outfits of passers by; gauging their confidence; deciding whether they are an individual or just following a crowd and whether they do actually have style or a concept of fashion.
Let us start by trying to define – in the context of clothes and how to wear them – what style and fashion actually constitute. We should remember however, that this is a very subjective issue, you may not agree with what I say, but that is the basis of a good debate. You SHOULD form your own opinions. To me, style and fashion are completely different things, they purport to different aspects of clothing and its related world as a whole.
Being stylish or having style is about much more than just clothes. It is about the lifestyle you choose, it requires a depth of knowledge and understanding that would make you a well rounded person, it shows that you have passion for all those things we often take for granted: music, food, travel, culture and art. You should exude a careful confidence and have mastered the sweeping glance that makes women really want to be with you and men really want to be you. To put it simply, you must become the perfect gentleman.
Style Look Book
To help you understand what I’m getting at, here are a few men whom I consider – inasmuch as clothes are concerned – to have achieved the kind of style or perfection I have in mind. This is of course only a selection and a fairly restricted one at that but it does give you an idea of what I perceive so you are perfectly entitled to disagree. If so, suggest some of your stylish looks in the comments section.

You may well have noticed that the Look Book contains examples that are slightly different to what you might have expected, the most notable difference being that I have decided to use normal people in place of the usual celebrities or designers. This is because they are more often than not viewed as style icons; the people we look to for inspiration and to a certain extent, guidance. While they do represent style and stylishness, they do not necessarily represent the style consciousness of the everyday man, what I wanted to purvey was relatable style; real outfits on normal people.
Of course, style is just as much, if not more about the clothes than the lifestyle. After all there isn’t any point in being the perfect gentleman: cultured and refined, without a superb wardrobe. Style is eternal, it is classic, transitive, quality, considered and precise, each outfit should work perfectly for you and you should look perfect in it. This is not to say that everyone will think agree with your assertions of perfection (subjectivity remember), but not everyone has an eye for style. Those gifted with such a thing however will almost always recognise the person who has made the effort, and while they may be few and far between, if you are observant, you will catch the odd glance, the quick look that will tell you that you have achieved what you set out to achieve – a perfect look.
To create this look, the clothes you wear should reflect your attitude and what you are trying to achieve. You want to have outfits that look good all the time, but they won’t necessarily follow specific trends. This means style tends to err on the side of formal, with a far more tailored cut to your clothes. It should be more sophisticated and elegant, with emphasis placed on finding timeless and transitional key items; a pair of brogues, a cotton trench coat, a crisp white shirt, a fine knit piece of knitwear, a pair of perfectly fitting jeans or trousers.
Quality comes from investment; paying a bit more for your clothes makes a world of difference. This isn’t to say you should rush out and and spend hundreds of pounds on a shirt, but that little bit extra ensures you get a better cut and fit, finer material and more often than not, greater longevity. You can achieve style on a budget, you simply need to pick your items carefully and look after them. Confidence in your outfit is also a huge part of having style – you have to believe you look good.
For me, fashion is a thing of two halves. One half is the fashion based around trends; the latest brands and items and recreating the current looks – Military, Biker and Nautical to name but a few. It remains intrinsically linked to the constantly changing face of the fashion world and is far more temporary than style, but it is only temporary to the extent that it is always evolving and shifting. In this sense fashion is about the pushing boundaries, mixing new and old whilst always keeping sight of what is on trend.
Fashion Look Book

As with the style look book I wanted to avoid using images of celebrities so that I could clearly show the fashion of normal people. I also wanted to showcase how fashion manifests itself in the form of trends (particularly military) and experimentation. In this instance it is clear that fashion has a much stronger link to the catwalk and its transient nature, whilst style is more permanent. By using images of the everyday man it is also much easier to establish how much of high fashion trickles down to the high street; a key aspect of fashion and the clothing industry as a whole.
The other half is the fashion of the masses, summed up quite neatly on GQ magazine’s website by our good friend David Gandy.
“We have such a heritage in this country. People from other countries, all the R’n'B stars, they come to Savile Row and they’re in immaculate three-piece suits. Then you see British guys and they just can’t seem to dress. We have all these fashion agendas, punk and Vivienne Westwood and everything, but the queue seems to be at Abercrombie & Fitch down the road. That is just heartbreaking to me. Why does everyone want a polo shirt and three-quarter-length combat shorts?”
– David Gandy
It would be fair to say that the majority of males you see on the street will fit this bill, but this is not to say that either of these groups is unfashionable, nor is it suggesting that they have scant regard for their appearance – rather, they go about fashion in a different way. A key element of fashion or style is obviously the interest in clothes and fashion; you won’t take a particularly keen interest in something that doesn’t really bother you, and herein is the key to this half of the debate: can you still be interested in your appearance and how you look and what you wear, even be called fashionable, but not be the least bit interested in the latest trends or having style?
With this question we come back to good old subjectivity. We all have our own ideas, so it would be perfectly acceptable for example to argue that those God awful, ugly and disgusting joggers that a large number of men deem appropriate for public viewing are in fact very fashionable, why would everyone wear them if they weren’t? It is human nature to want to fit in, someone that is different in either action or appearance is often at a disadvantage. I experience it every time I go home. The look I have created for myself, which I should point out is nothing out of the ordinary, just doesn’t work back in my home town (a sleepy little farming town in the middle of Dorset) – while in Brighton it fits perfectly well.
My home town is a place of jogging bottoms, three quarter length combat shorts and an Abercrombie & Fitch polo shirt. The brands of choice are Superdry, Hollister and Jack Wills – but this is the fashion of the area, of the people. While we might sniff at these brands and the looks they produce, we should remember that the people who are truly interested in fashion and style are in the minority, so while we sniff at them, they probably sniff back at the chap who is being very fashion forward with block colour outfits, but to them looks just like a pack of skittles. When we consider both sides, it becomes a lot harder to distinguish which party is the fashionable, stylish one.
You could also argue that trends and this fashion of the masses are quite closely linked. As with nearly everything, joggers are a trend, they will not be ‘in’ forever, eventually something else will take over, looks will change and we will finally be rid of this dirty blot on our fashion radar. Real fashion-conscious trending however is far more transient and developed, but it still only makes limited use of style and the timeless items associated with it. Trending fashion is still dictated by change and what is new.
Perhaps the best way to trend and exhibit an understanding of style is to invest in heritage. Get a Barbour or Belstaff Waxed Jacket rather than a quilted one, get a good gingham shirt, a pair of slim jeans, cuff them and pair with a pair of chunky brogues – even mix in a paisley neckerchief for a great mix of style, heritage and bohemia.
Product Picks
In keeping with the idea that fashion and style are two different things I have chosen a selection of clothes that to suit either aspect; from the timeless classic to the experimental and individual.
Conclusion
In my opinion Style and Fashion are two completely different things but being part of one or the other is no bad thing, its how you create yourself within either of them that will mark you out from the masses. As for the question of whether the style of the few or the fashion of the rest is the better side, of course I would choose the former. No matter what people think, it is nearly always better to be different – be it subtle or obvious, daring or reserved – following the crowd isn’t always the best choice.
Now you’ve had my view, so let’s get yours.
- Would you agree that there is a difference between style and fashion?
- If so what would your definition be?
- Or do you think that they are intertwined; one cannot work without the other?
- Is there a fashion of the masses?
- Could this be the real or true definition of fashion?
- What do you think Style actually is? Is it about more than just clothes?
- Do you hate those bloody joggers as much as I do?
(P.S. I would like to point out that I have no objection to joggers being worn in and around the house, where no one can see you. They have NO place outside the front door however.)
Give it all you’ve got and get your opinion heard in the comments below.
Will
Men’s Guide To Business-Casual – The Summer Edition
Paying Attention To The Details
Five SS13 Menswear Staples
Men's Short Hairstyles
Men's Mid-length Hairstyles
Men's Long Hairstyles
Men's Curly Hairstyles
Men's Black & Afro Hairstyles
Celebrity Hairstyles


















Men’s Fashion Debate: Who’s To Say You Look Good?
Men’s Sicilian Style Inspiration
A Guide To: Men’s Italian Style
Taking Style Inspiration From Others






























For me style and fashion, I’ve always seen as totally different. Style, like you mentioned is the timeless look, I see it, almost in a similar way to Modernism, style is the perfection of form. That beauty of attitude as well as aesthetics, something you can see above the clothes someone is wearing. Fashion though, I see as something that people fancy at the time, because everyone else is wearing it. That’s not to say I don’t buy fashionable clothes, because I do, but I use it to accent what would be (for me) a timeless and stylish base. Though I’ll say, for me, I can’t actually buy the more expensive or designer brands of clothes (especially shirts/blazers/coats) because they don’t make them small enough to fit me (34″ chest). Which is frustrating, because they are items I would definitely invest in.
So I think you can be stylish without fashion, because style isn’t governed by fashion. For me, you can’t be fashionable without style, because if you’re just a carbon copy of the mannequin in Topman, the masses might think you’re cool, but I think to people who take their dress a bit more seriously, would just see you as the archetypal sheep. It’s not bad to think like that, we need things to feel good and keep our self esteem at the level it needs to be so it’s natural.
As for the masses in joggers and flip flops (Yes I detest them too), no there isn’t a fashion. It’s not fashionable even though lots of people wear it, fashion is influenced by what’s on the catwalks, which joggers aren’t, and until they are, for me I’ll never see them as fashion. I guess, it’s style > fashion > popular.
Fashion vs. Style is legitimate topic of discussion and great idea for an article. I just feel your choice of picture illustrates it very poorly.
I mean pictures 3 a 5 embody style for me way more than fashion. Vice versa for style pic 6 (feels more like a fashion thing but less so than the above mentioned “fashion” pics feel more like from the style dpt.).
Are you sure you didnt switch the two categories? :)
I agree with your definitions: fashion is transient, style is much more stable. Fashionable is what you see on a mannequin at Topman’s. Stylish is what you do when you take those items and incorporate them into your own look.
I never thought about style being more than clothes, but that thought is resonating in my brain a little. Maybe you’re onto something there.
I think the difference between style and fashion is the difference between a man and a boy, (or being taken seriously and being able to get away with being adventurous at a younger age). Obviously the line can be blurred, and to great effect, but a 40 year old isn’t going to be taken seriously if he looks like he’s crashed through Topman. As for people in Hollister joggers, they’re the clueless inbetween that have atleast tried to keep abreast of whats popular but nevertheless failed at employing their eyes and brain (and who probably think that a Conservative is the glass thing on the back of your house and that Nelson Mandella is the guy in Shawshank Redemption.)
I liked your point about can you be considered stylish without really caring about style, as it’s something I hope can be acheivable as instead of spending my weekends trying clothes on i’d rather be enjoying myself. I’d like my clothes to reflect my life, not take it over.
There are some interesting quotes in the bottom right hand corner of these articles, which sum the differences up quite nicely. Such as “Fashion is what you adopt when you dont know who you are.” Quentin Crisp
edit/correction: pictures 3 and 5 under the fashion lookbook (left to right, top to bottom)
One of the best articles I have read on her Will and I have been using this site pretty much every day for the last year.
excellent work.
I agree with this statement wholeheartedly.
Great article, it’s something i’ve been thinking about for a while actually.
Often you champion the likes of Topman etc on this site but if I think about all the stylish people I know, none of them shop at Topman or even the high street, nor designer brands, and usually tend to have their own ‘style’ that makes them stand out from the crowd.
That second style picture makes excellent use of a much maligned but incredibly potent accessory. Not the neckerchief; the cigarette.
Brilliant read, Will. Well done.
people talk about timelessness a lot, but lets not forget with shows like mad men that that is now actually a fashionable look,.
Hey all,
I couldnt find any other way to put this question out there so I just decided to toss it out here!
I was looking into investing in a leather jacket and I live in a fairly small city with NO choice at all….so I have to do my best at keeping up with things via internet etc.
I ended up purchasing the Superdry Brad Leather jacket, but now that I do more research, did I buy a dud? I mean it seems that superdry is more a “athletic” brand, it that makes sense? I think I may have made a mistake with this purchase and just wondering peoples opinions???
I found an all saints jackets thats pretty deadly, so I’m thinking I should return the superdry one.
Any opinions/advice would be very appreciated!
base it on the fit and finish of the jacket mate – Superdry can sometimes come off as a bit sixth-former-ish so if it’s clearly branded that’s a fair enough reason to want to take it back. But if it fits you well and seems high quality then keep it – it’s hard to find leather that does. Allsaints leather, while we’re at it, I would recommend in a heartbeat if you do take back the Superdry.
1) Yes i believe there IS a difference between style and fashion…
2) … I believe style is classic, and eternal, and will always look good, whereas fashion fades in and out, is worn by the masses, and seems to produce a whole lot of sheep who all wear the same bloody clothes…
3)…I DON’T think they are intertwined all that much, to be honest; Style does not have trends.
4) Yes, I certainly believe there IS a fashion of the masses. Around where I live, that seems to be low sagging drop crotch chinos in some (in my opinion) truly hideous colours, worn with a colourful polo shirt.
5) … and yes, I believe the masses fashion is the true definition of fashion….
6) … style, in my opinion is about looking refined and an individual. Looking the best you possibly can, and acting as well as you look.
7) YES!
Fashion, is a business. The very fact there is trends is what makes it a successful one.
Everyone, men and women, constantly have to feel they are one-upping everyone in their vicinity, be it with clothes, desirability of their partner(s), humour, etc. Their overall status.
Someone saw the matrix, and realised that, if there is a constant change in what is considered fashionable by society, then people will constantly buy the new to have that one up on everyone else.
Style, is for those who also see the matrix. Fashion is the mannequin outside the shop. Style is looking past it and opening the doors.
Those with style realise the shawllowness of the business, and don’t feel the need anymore to out-do their peers. They don’t buy clothes because they are on trend, rather because they are clothes they can see themselves wearing. Not the shop mannequin.
Style can not be condensed into just clothes. It is in a man’s walk. Expression. Charm. Cologne. Stance. His drink. It is not something that is ‘switched on’ when you put on your nautical top and chinos, or a tailored suit.
From the moment one wakes up to the moment one goes to bed, it their brand of life.
There is no correct way to describe perfect style. If there was, then we would all strive towards it, making it fashion. Not style.
Fashion and style is the same age old arguement of ‘which came first the chicken or the egg?’
To me i feel fashion is the early teens experimenting with different ideas all the way through to the mid twenties. At this point it then starts merging into style in sort of a coming of age process.ie- where you use the past 15 odd years of experience and drop the ones where you didn’t feel yourself and keep the ones which make you come into your own. Im only 19 yet i know many combinations i’ve bought and worn, some of which just to be ‘on trend’ and others where the items just jumped out at me. The latter will be in my wardrobe for years to come!
Style is a mans lifestyle, only a part of it is the clothes and cut.
Fashion is for the masses who want the ‘now’ look which changes every other week. Style is groomed, shaped and improved as you age, and it always looks back on timeless classics such as the leather jacket and the grey suit.
As for joggers ( i call them loungewear for a reason) never set foot outside in them
The egg
I’ve been reading this site for quite a while, but this article has prompted me to comment for the first time – great read, it really got me thinking (dangerous times, I know).
To me, style is something that transcends the domains of the visual to something that is more reflexive (the process of reflecting within oneself) and non-representational. There is a large breadth of academic writing around how individuals form their identities based on their surroundings, how they interact with their environment and how they interact with other people. To me, ‘style’ is a visual representation of an individual’s identity.
This is why finding one’s style is often a process and doesn’t happen for a lot of men until they are in at least their mid-20s. It requires past experiences and pre-constructed social/cultural frameworks that are completely unique to an individual. Maybe it takes 25 or so years for enough experience to build up for a man to be able to comfortably exude his own style. The comment about style being the difference between a man and a boy really rang true with me.
For me, fashion is something more tangible than style. It represents the visions of fashion designers in their catwalk showcases that pervade into everyday social consciousness. Fashion is a physical thing that you follow, style is not – style is YOU.
Fashion changes, but style is timeless because style is a representation of a person. Love that quote in a previous comment so much I’ll repeat it here: “Fashion is what you adopt when you dont know who you are.” Quentin Crisp
Oh, and for the record, I HATE jogging bottoms and wouldn’t be caught dead in them! :)
I really believe in the difference between fashion and style. I live in Kendal, near the Lake District and I would call it the least stylish place in England, with all these little chavs walking around lookinf like River Island, and the All-Saints-rip-offs-from-Topman vommed on them. I do really like Topman, it can produce some really great stuff, which is NOT purchased by the masses. i feel chinos are really a part of classic style, and only recently has it been massacred by the Chav. I do not mind those who were Jack Wills but ONLY if they were it well, because I also think that the tradition it TRIES to emulate is a brilliant style, the Sloane Square, Great Gatsby, Tom Brown Schoolday look, but yes, just becasue you have a Jack Wills hoodie, sweats, tee shirt and flipflops on does NOT mean you lok good.
(Also, nautical isn’t a style, it is a lifestyle, my whole family has a nautical wardrobe, because of the fact we sail, so i think that it is a genuine beautiful style.)
I also think that All-Saints is tat and not really worthy of its recognition, as it mainly sells slag-tops with horrendously low neck lines.
And sharply made, beautifully finished denims and leathers, as well as marvellously rustic tailoring and outerwear. But you know, if their tees are JLS worthy they can’t be any good…
Quick point about Joggers….are they ok in the gym?
It doesn’t speak very well of my style credentials given the need to exude a confidence in all situations in order to achieve it, but on a related matter I find myself reverting to buying clothes on the high street not so much due to a restrictive budget, but more so because I’m slightly intimidated by shopping in designer stores. At 26 I occupy this middle ground where I want to remain youthful but also want to up my game in terms of embracing a more refined appearance by investing in quality. Taking that required step away from your comfort zone isn’t that easy though. I’m also very male in that I don’t particularly enjoy engaging with staff in shops, assistants in less frequented high end stores being the most likely to approach you. This makes me even less likely to step into a more high end store for any length of time that might lead to spotting something worth trying on and possibly investing in. While really it’s just a warped sense of narcissism in being far too aware of one’s self, I feel like a bit of a fraud as in all honesty my budget makes it unlikely that I would do anything other than browse, which causes my demeanor to make that very apparent, rendering the whole experience a bit too intense as I reluctantly scarper back to Topman.
PS. Joggers but more so drop crotch chinos, especially with elasticated hems at the ankle make me want to punch total strangers.
Agree completely. The person who invented drop crotch ‘chinos’ should be shot.
While I do agree with some points raised in the article, I believe timelesness is a bit overrated now. There’s obviously a difference between style and fashion, but it’s not wether you wear classic clothes or opt for a bolder look. There is no universal criteria on what items or looks are beautiful and desirable, and to say that style is just timelessness and tailoring is denying the diversity out there.
I think having style is to achieve a look that goes with your lifestyle and personality, and is not defined by trends but by your personal preference. Fashion in its strict sense, however, would be to follow trends without thinking, just because they are in.
We should not forget also that style changes and evolves over the course of time (both personal style and what is consider tasteful by society), and that this development is both unavoidable and desirable.
That said, I prefer more of a classical or at least not so trend-driven look myself.
I apologise profusely for not replying to any of the comments you guys have made, I have been squirreled away in Greece for the past 3 weeks-ish so I’ve been unable to access the internet. However! I am now back and normal service shall be resumed.
It is really good to see some differing opinions and it is also very nice to see people questioning my interpretation, it shows just how diverse men’s fashion can be, each and every one of us has our own opinion and thoughts and that is what will make your style special.
Phenomenal article!! I must agree that for me too, fashion will always been associated with trends as well as the hectic business and design house affiliations. Style on the other hand, leaves little room for subjectivity – you either have it, or you don’t. Elegance and an impression of suave rather than ‘sick’ separates the real men from the crowd.